Legality and Legitimacy , livre ebook

icon

212

pages

icon

English

icon

Ebooks

2004

Lire un extrait
Lire un extrait

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus

Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !

Je m'inscris

Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !

Je m'inscris
icon

212

pages

icon

English

icon

Ebooks

2004

Lire un extrait
Lire un extrait

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus

Carl Schmitt ranks among the most original and controversial political thinkers of the twentieth century. His incisive criticisms of Enlightenment political thought and liberal political practice remain as shocking and significant today as when they first appeared in Weimar Germany. Unavailable in English until now, Legality and Legitimacy was composed in 1932, in the midst of the crisis that would lead to the collapse of the Weimar Republic and only a matter of months before Schmitt's collaboration with the Nazis. In this important work, Schmitt questions the political viability of liberal constitutionalism, parliamentary government, and the rule of law. Liberal governments, he argues, cannot respond effectively to challenges by radical groups like the Nazis or Communists. Only a presidential regime subject to few, if any, practical limitations can ensure domestic security in a highly pluralistic society.Legality and Legitimacy is sure to provide a compelling reference point in contemporary debates over the challenges facing constitutional democracies today. In addition to Jeffrey Seitzer's translation of the 1932 text itself, this volume contains his translation of Schmitt's 1958 commentary on the work, extensive explanatory notes, and an appendix including selected articles of the Weimar constitution. John P. McCormick's introduction places Legality and Legitimacy in its historical context, clarifies some of the intricacies of the argument, and ultimately contests Schmitt's claims regarding the inherent weakness of parliamentarism, constitutionalism, and the rule of law.
Voir icon arrow

Publié par

Date de parution

26 février 2004

EAN13

9780822385769

Langue

English

Poids de l'ouvrage

1 Mo

L E G A L I T Y A N D L E G I T I M A C Y
L E G A L I T Y
A N D L E G I T I M A C Y
9
Carl Schmitt
translated and edited by Jeffrey Seitzer
with an introduction by John P. McCormick
Duke University Press Durham & London

©  to English translation Duke University Press
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 
by C. H. Westmoreland
Designed
Typeset in Trump Medieval with Jaeger Daily
News display by Tseng Information Systems, Inc.
Library of Congress
Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this
book.
The first edition was published in German asLegalität und Legitimität
by Duncker und Humblot, with all rights reserved ©  Duncker und
Humblot, Munich and Leipzig. Carl
Schmitt’s untitled comments on
Legalität und Legitimitätappeared in a volume of his essays, titledVerfas-
sungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren –: Materialien zu einer
Verfassungslehre. These comments were first published in German, with
all rights reserved ©  Duncker und Humblot GmbH, Berlin.
9
To Janet Smith
C O N T E N T S
Translator’s Preface ix Identifying or Exploiting the Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy? An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’sLegality and Legitimacy . cxiii
9 Legality and Legitimacy
Introduction: The Legislative State System of Legality Com-pared to Other State Types (Jurisdiction, Governmental, and Administrative States)
I The System of Legality of the Parliamentary Legislative State
. The Legislative State and the Concept of Law  . Legality and the Equal Chance for Achieving Political Power 
II The Three Extraordinary Lawgivers of the Weimar Constitution
. The Extraordinary LawgiverRatione Materiae: The Sec-ond Principal Part of the Weimar Constitution as a Second Constitution  . The Extraordinary LawgiverRatione Supremitatis: Actual Meaning—Plebiscitary Legitimacy instead of Legislative State Legality  . The Extraordinary LawgiverRatione Necessitatis: Actual Meaning—The Administrative State Measure Displaces the Parliamentary Legislative State Statute 
Conclusion  Afterword ()  Appendix: Selected Articles of the Weimar Constitution  Notes  Works Cited by Carl Schmitt inLegality and Legitimacy Index 
viii
Contents
T R A N S L ATO R ’ S P R E FA C E 9
Much of the current interest in Carl Schmitt centers on his contribution to political theory during the Weimar Republic. However, Schmitt was by training and by inclination a legal theorist, a fact reflected in his work from this period. Not only does he focus on issues where politics and law naturally inter-sect, such as those involving the nature and limits of constitu-tional government; but his mode of argumentation is also de-cidedly ‘‘legal’’ even in those essays that do not address legal questions directly. The legal cast of Schmitt’s political theory, moreover, is deeply steeped in the Continental, particularly German, legal tradition, which deviates in important respects from the Anglo-American one. Because Schmitt was primarily writing for a German audi-ence, and one with some knowledge of German law, he could assume that the reader had a sufficient understanding of the distinctive features of this tradition as well as of how the Wei-mar Constitution constituted both a continuation and a de-parture from it. Also, writing in the midst of a political crisis, Schmitt could assume that the reader was familiar with major political, social, and economic developments and with the main currents of thought, including his own, on how to re-spond to the pressing problems of the Weimar Republic. In preparing the translation, however, I assumed that the intended reader does not have in-depth knowledge in all of these areas. Compensating for the abstractness of Schmitt’s presentation, I have included explanatory notes discussing as-pects of the Weimar context, which provide an unstated back-ground to the work. My aim in doing so is not to argue for or against Schmitt’s position, but rather to provide readers with information that may aid them in understanding and evalu-ating Schmitt’s argument. The translator’s notes are placed in brackets to distinguish them from Schmitt’s. Among the explanatory notes are a number concerning the translation of particular terms. Given the frequent references to the institutions of government, both in Schmitt’s text and
Translator’s Preface
ix
Voir icon more
Alternate Text