This study reviews trends in aid provided to the health sector in Somalia over 2000-2009. It is a testimony to the commitment of donors and implementers who have relentlessly tried to improve the dire health situation of millions of Somalis. At the same time, this study is a wake-up call for all donors and implementers. Have donors been generous enough? Have millions of dollars been invested in the most efficient way to maximize results? Did donors choose the right priorities? Did they stay the course? Did they learn from their own mistakes? The answers are mixed. Donors stepped up their contributions over the decade: some new financiers came, some others left, but overall, financial support has been constantly increasing. Emergencies took up 30 percent of the overall funding, thus demonstrating the impact on the health sector of man-made and natural disasters. Only 20 percent was allocated for horizontal programs, with increasing funds over the last part of the decade. Vertical programs dominated aid financing for health: in the case of AIDS, TB, and malaria, the generous funding of the last years of the decade do not appear justifiable. Malnutrition, EPI, and reproductive health programs never got the attention they deserved. The key conclusion of this study is that donors' funding for public health in Somalia over the past decade could have been used more strategically. Better coordination among donors, local authorities, and implementers is now needed to avoid the mistakes of the past and to ensure that priority setting for future interventions is more evidence based and more results oriented.
World Bank Working Papers are published to communicate the results of the Banks work to the devel-opment community with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally-edited texts. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. This volume is a product of the staffof the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Thendings, interpre-tations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judg-ment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmiĴing portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Of-1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422;ce of the Publisher, The World Bank, e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org.
Data Collection Process ....................................................................................................14
Types of Quantitative Data Collected ............................................................................14 Methodological Limitations and Challenges.................................................................16
Usefulness of the Data ......................................................................................................18
Figure 2.1. DAC members net ODA 19902009 and DAC Secretariat simulations ofnetODAto2010..............................................................................................................5 Figure 2.2. DAH from 1990 to 2007 by channel of assistance ...............................................7 Figure 2.3. DAH from 1990 to 2007 by disease .......................................................................8 Figure 2.4. Net DAC ODA to fragile states excluding debt relief (19902008) ..................9 Figure 2.5. Net ODA to fragile states excluding debt (2008) ................................................9 Figure 2.6. Country programmable aid for fragile states (200911) ..................................10 Figure 2.7. ODA to Somalia (200008) ...................................................................................11 Figure 2.8. ODA to fragile states .............................................................................................12 Figure 3.1. Explanations for the difference between donor disbursement and recipients and implementing agencies expenditures.................................................16 Figure 4.1. Financial aidows in the Somalia health sector ...............................................19 Figure 4.2. Total health sector aidnancing (200009)........................................................20 Figure 4.3. Total health sector aidnancing by donor category (200009) ......................21 Figure 4.4. Percentage contribution of health sector aidnancing by donor category(200009).............................................................................................................22 Figure 4.5. Percentage contribution of health sector aidnancing (2000 and 2009) .......22 Figure 4.6. Percentage contribution by program (200009) ................................................24 Figure 4.7. Percentage contribution by program (200009) ................................................24 Figure 4.8. Health expenditure: TB, malaria, and HIV (200009) ......................................25 Figure 4.9. Health expenditures: TB, malaria, and HIV (200009).....................................26 Figure 4.10. Health expenditures: Tuberculosisnancing versus TB case detection and TB success rate (200009) ..........................................................................................26 Figure 4.11. Health expenditures: Poliomyelitis (200009) .................................................27 Figure 4.12. Health expenditure: EPI funding versus DTP1 and DTP3 coverage (200009).............................................................................................................................28 Figure 4.13. Health expenditures: Reproductive health (200009) ....................................28 Figure 4.14. Health expenditures: Nutritionnancing versus malnutrition indicators(200009)...........................................................................................................29 Figure 4.15. Health expenditures: Emergency (200009) ....................................................30 Figure 4.16. Health expenditures: Horizontal programshospital care, health systems strengthening, and primary health care .........................................................30 Figure 4.17. Expenditure by activity for 2007 to 2009horizontal programs .................31 Figure 4.18. Distribution of health expenditures by zone (200009) .................................31 Figure 4.19. Distribution of population and health expenditures by zone (200009) ....32
Tables
A Decade of Aid to the Health Sector in Somalia 20002009
v
Table 1.1. Health and nutrition-related MDG indicators, most recent estimates ..............3 Table 2.1. External aid allocated to health care in fragile states ........................................11 Table 3.1. Percentage difference between data collected from donors and recipients and implementing agencies ...........................................................................15 Table 4.1. Total health sector aidnancing using current and constant rate of exchange and adjusting for U.S. dollar ination (200009).........................................21 Table 4.2. Per capita health sector aidnancing (US$) .......................................................23 Table 4.3. Health sector aid by disease and program (200009) (US$ million) ................23
Foreword TohtdetvodidrpnaidsitrenewsiverydutssihyntohttseitomItisa200009.oairevSnilamoecsrtoheethal e commitment of donors and implementers who have re-lentlessly tried to improve the dire health situation of millions of Somalis. At the same time, this study is a wake-up call for all donors and implementers. Have donors been generous enough? Have millions of dollars been invested in the most efficient way to maximize results? Did donors choose the right priorities? Did they stay the course? Did they learn from their own mistakes? The answers are mixed. Donors stepped up their contributions over the decade: some newnanciers came, some others left, but overall,nancial support has been con-stantly increasing. Emergencies took up 30 percent of the overall funding, thus dem-onstrating the impact on the health sector of man-made and natural disasters. Only 20 percent was allocated for horizontal programs, with increasing funds over the last part of the decade. Vertical programs dominated aidnancing for health: in the case of AIDS, TB, and malaria, the generous funding of the last years of the decade does not appear justiable. Malnutrition, EPI (expanded program on immunization), and reproductive health programs never got the aĴention they deserved. The key conclusion of this study is that donors funding for public health in Soma-lia over the past decade could have been used more strategically. BeĴer coordination among donors, local authorities, and implementers is now needed to avoid the mistakes of the past and to ensure that priority seĴing for future interventions is more evidence based and more results oriented.
Johannes C. M. ZuĴCountry Director Eritrea, Kenya, Rwanda, and Somalia
Eva Jarawan Sector Manager Health, Nutrition, and Population
vii
Acknowledgments he authors thank the donors, UN agencies, and international NGOs who kindly par-Tticipated in the study, shared data, aĴended consultative meetings, and provided comments on the draft report. Special thanks to the Health Sector CommiĴee of the Somalia Support Secretariat and in particular to the HSC Chair, Dr. Marthe Everard, and HSC Coordinator, Dr. Ka-mran Mashhadi, for providing the researchers with the opportunity to engage with all key stakeholders.