CommentaryCommentaireVitamin D insufficiency: no recommended dietaryallowance exists for this nutrient Reinhold Vieth, Donald Fraserß See related article page 1517ickets, a defect in bone growth during infancy and designed to ensure anything. They are simply based on thechildhood, was first characterized in 1650. Al- old, default strategy for setting a nutritional guideline,R though cod-liver oil was used as a folk remedy in which is to recommend an amount of nutrient similar tonorthern Europe starting in the late 1700s, it was not until what healthy people are eating. This approach underlies1922 that the medical community realized that something the circular logic behind a familiar refrain about nutrition:1,2in it prevented and cured rickets. As recently as 4 decades “If you eat a good diet, you won’t need supplements.” Byago, physicians assumed that vitamin D nutrition was ade- this logic, the answer to the question, “How much nutrientquate if people exhibited no clinical or radiographic signs do you need?” is, “Whatever healthy people happen to be3,4 of rickets. Osteomalacia, the adult counterpart of rickets, eating.” The essential point, lost in the confusing terminol-was rarely seen, and it was assumed that adults require no ogy of modern nutrient recommendations, is that a recom-4more, and usually less, vitamin D than infants do. It was mended daily allowance (RDA) does not yet exist for vita-also assumed that the D generated in the skin, vita- min ...
Voir