15-09-0xxx-00-003c-comment-resolutions [Compatibility Mode]
6
pages
English
Documents
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe Tout savoir sur nos offres
6
pages
English
Documents
Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe Tout savoir sur nos offres
Publié par
Langue
English
May 2009doc.: IEEE 802.15-09/386r0Project: IEEEIEEEIIEEEEEE P802.15 WoWorrkingkiinngg GrGroupoup forforforfor WiWirre elesslesss PersonalPersonalPPersonal ArArArAreaeaeaea Networks (WPANs)Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions of Sponsor Ballot]Date Submitted: [May 2009]Source: [T. Baykas, C.S Sum, R. Funada, M.A Rahman, J. Wang, Z.Lan, C.W. PYO, F. Kojima, H. Harada, S. Kato]Company [NICT]AddressAddress [[33-44 HikarinoHikarino-okaoka, Yokosuka]Voice:[] FAX: []. E-Mail:[]Re: []Abstract: [Comment Resolutions of Sponsor Ballot]Purpose:Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right toto add, amendamend or withdraw material contained hereinherein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.Submission Slide 1 Tuncer Baykas, NICTMay 2009doc.: IEEE 802.15-09/386r0Summary:This document presents resolutions for comments 28, 38, 134, 133,109, 99, 19, 125, 129, 34, 127, 135Submission Slide 2 Tuncer Baykas, NICTMay 2009doc.: IEEE 802.15-09/386r0Com Name Inde Vote Aff. Cat. Pg Subclause Line Comment File Must Proposed Change Resolution ment x # Be # ...
Voir
Publié par
Langue
English
May 2009doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0 Submission Title:[Comment Resolutions of Sponsor Ballot] Date Submitted:[May 2009] Source:[T. Baykas, C.S Sum, R. Funada, M.A Rahman, J. Wang, Z.Lan, C.W. PYO, F. Kojima, H. Harada, S. Kato] Company[NICT] Voice:[] FAX: []. EMail:[] Re:[]
Abstract:[Comment Resolutions of Sponsor Ballot] Purpose:[Comment Resolutions of Sponsor Ballot] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15.It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right ,. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
Submission
Slide 1
Tuncer Baykas,NICT
May 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0
Summary: This document presents resolutions for comments 28, 38, 134, 133,109, 99, 19, 125, 129, 34, 127, 135
Submission
Slide 2
Tuncer Baykas, NICT
May 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0
Com NameInde oteAff. Cat.Pg SubclauseLine CommentFile MustProposed ChangeResolution ment x# Be # Satisfi ed AddonebitsuggestedPCESandonebitsuggested23 Livneh,toTechni 12.1Appro Qualcosymplify RXimplementation,No addprocedurePilotwordfieldstoreceivestatusfieldin12.1.8.3.Noam vemm calRXshouldbeabletoforceTXtotoenableRXtoValue0forpilotwordindicatesthatnopilotwordshouldbesentand1suggestsusingpilotwords.transmitPCESanorpi otwor orceTXtoValue0forpcesindicatesthatnopcesshouldbetransmitPCESsentand1suggeststousepcesbits.and/orpilotword AddonebitsuggestedPCESandonebitsuggested38 bar,Disapp Qualco Techni12.1 tosymplify RXimplementation,Yes addprocedurevere rovemm cas ouea etoorcetotoena etoValue0forpilotwordindicatesthatnopilotwordtransmitPCESand/orpilotword forceTXtoshouldbesentand1suggestsusingpilotwords.Value0forpces indicatesthatnopcess hould betransmitPCESsentand1suggeststousepces bits.and/orpilotword as er,sapp neec n. .o. usecsoo.s ores em m numccepnpr nc p e.mesAssaf roveCorpor calwillputamuchtolargeburdenSIFSto2usec onlyanoptionandmandatorymodeation onimplementation is2us.
Submission
Slide 3
Tuncer Baykas, NICT
May 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0
Com NameInde oteAff. Cat.Pg SubclauseLine CommentFile MustProposed ChangeResolution ment x# Be # Satisfi ed Pilotwordoflength0shouldnotbeallowed.Acceptinprinciple,ForanyMCSotherthanDisallowpilotword133 Kasher,7 Disapp IntelYes12.2.3.4. 38Techni 91 Itmandatesthatthereceiverwillhavetooflength0ormakeCMS,supportforpilotwordlength0isAssaf roveCorpor cal1 implementatimedomainequalizerevenifitation canimplementafrequencydomainequalizer. spreadingof64isusedandnoequalizationisnecesssary. Changechiprate1728Mchips/swaschosenbasedonpopularAccept,removeallrepetitionsof1728109 Baykas,29 No74 12.2.2.3(NICT) Techni7 Appro cellphonecrystals.Howeverrecentadvancedfrom1728mchips/sMchp/sfromthestandardexcept12.2.2.3.Tuncer vecal cellphonesdeploy40Mhzcyrstals.Thereforeto1760mchips/s Changethetimingrelatedtablesaccordingly.Mchips/s 802.11TGadwillbebuildinguponthe802.11nchoosesamplingAccept,Changechipratefrom1728mchips/s99 Perahia,Intel4 Appro12.2.2.3 29NoTechni 74 specificationandproducts.Itishighlylikelyratethatisafactorto1760mchips/s. Eldad veCorpor cal thatthesamplingratechosenwillbeafactorof40MHz. removeallrepetitionsof1728Mchp/sfromation of40MHz.Inordertobestenablecoexistenceetween802.15.3can802.11TGa ,c oosetimingrelatedtablesaccordingly.samplingratethatisafactorof40MHz.
Submission
Slide 4
Tuncer Baykas, NICT
May 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0
ment x# Be # Satisfi ed No . This 19 Bosco,Approve MotorolaGenis a well written, technically correct document.About the Suggestion to combine OFDM I am approving this revision. The inclusion of low Bruce Incmodes: Although AV and HSI OFDM PHYs complexity PHY modes such as PI/2 BPSK and share the same modulation technique, their OOK is a strong point as this should allow for low cos , consume arge epro ucs ne very near is very different and they provide solutions to future. I would strongly suggest that on the next different market segments. Therefore neither revision, a very hard look be made at either combining the HSI OFDM and the AV OFDM PHYcombining them nor eliminating of them is modes or eliminating one. Further, a look at whichgood for the standard. single carrier (SC) modes are actually being implemented in commercial products should be made with the idea of eliminating unused ones or poss ya ngnew ones ase requ remenan market evolves. Finally, again keeping the real market in focus, a look at possibly streamlining the MAC might be a good option for the next revision. 125 Trainin,Disappr IntelTech 9912.3.2.1 26The table 121 provides MCSs of the HISYes Mergeand unify theReject, Although AV and HSI OFDM PHYs Solomon oveCorporat PHYthat well overlaps the MCSs providedHRP and the HISshare the same modulation technique, their ion bythe AV PHY in the table 136. No reasonPHY framedesign and approach to communication different market segments. Therefore neither combining them nor eliminating of them is good for the standard. 129 Kasher,Disappr IntelTech 5912 9Two OFDM PHYs are redundant. There isYes Combineand unifyReject, Although AV and HSI OFDM PHYs Assaf oveCorporat noneed for two OFDM PHYsthe OFDM PHYs.share the same modulation technique, their ion Otherwise,show inframe design and approach to communication , the equivalentdifferent market segments. Therefore neither feature offered bycombining them nor eliminating of them is the other PHYgood for the standard. cannot be used here (e.g. Preamble, number of SC, 34 Hansen, C7 DisapprBroadco Tech99 12.31 It doesn't make sense to have 2 completeYes Unifythe two OFDMReject, Although AV and HSI OFDM PHYs ove mOFDM PHY modes that are so similar.PHYs in 12.3 andshare the same modulation technique, their 12.4. framedesign and approach to communication is very different and they provide solutions to different market segments. Therefore neither combining them nor eliminating of them is
Submission
Slide 5
Tuncer Baykas, NICT
May 2009
doc.: IEEE 802.1509/386r0
Com NameInde oteAff. Cat.Pg SubclauseLine CommentFile MustProposed ChangeResolution ment x# Be # Satisfi ed Reject, Different PHYs are a result of 127 Kasher,Disapp IntelHaving12 9Techni 593differentPHYs.NoneofYes Removetwoofdemands of different market segments, which Assaf roveCorpor calmandatory,willcreatemarketthePHYmodesare stated in the usage models, therefore eliminating some of them impair success of ation conusionanimpairorma eoneothe standard. For interoperability CMS is interoperabilityandsuccessofthemmandatory mandated to all PNC’s. thestandard. Reject,DAMImodeisoptionalandasthe135 Kasher,9 Disapp Intel12.2.8.2 27Techni 97DAMIprovidesminorYes RemoveDAMI commenterstatesprovidesimprovement.Assaf roveCorpor calimprovementoverotherat onnumerousmo es.av ngsomanymodescreatsconfusionandmarketfragmentation
Submission
Slide 6
Tuncer Baykas, NICT
