”Deep Pockets” Collateral Assignments of Patents and the Growth of Innovations

icon

26

pages

icon

English

icon

Documents

Écrit par

Publié par

Lire un extrait
Lire un extrait

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus

Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !

Je m'inscris

Découvre YouScribe et accède à tout notre catalogue !

Je m'inscris
icon

26

pages

icon

English

icon

Documents

Lire un extrait
Lire un extrait

Obtenez un accès à la bibliothèque pour le consulter en ligne En savoir plus

”Deep Pockets”, Collateral Assignments of Patents, and the Growth of Innovations Bruno Amable? Jean-Bernard Chatelain† Kirsten Ralf‡ February 14, 2005 Abstract This paper studies how imperfect collateral assignments of patents contribute to ”deep pockets” savings of innovative firms facing random investment oppor- tunities in Research and Development (R&D) and determine the growth of their innovations, using a version of the Kiyotaki and Moore [1997] model of credit cy- cles. Results are: patents as collateral leverages R&D finance and magnifies the e?ect of innovative rents on investment; the composition of current versus future financial constraints implies that firms savings decrease the steady state aggre- gate debt/patent ratio; the interaction between households and firms savings determine a leveraged growth of innovations which depends on the imperfection of collateral. Keywords: Collateral, Patents, Research and Development, Credit ra- tioning, Growth. ?University of Paris X and CEPREMAP, 48 Boulevard Jourdan 75014 Paris France. E-mail: †LEO, University of Orleans. E-mail: ‡American University of Paris, 147 rue de Grenelle, 75007 Paris, ESLSCA and CEPREMAP. E-mail: .

  • innovation

  • economy credit

  • intermediate goods

  • patent ratio

  • households

  • between households

  • since innovation

  • growth

  • a?ect economic

  • collateral


Voir icon arrow

Publié par

Langue

English

”DeepPockets”,CollateralAssignmentsofPatents,andtheGrowthofInnovationsBrunoAmableJean-BernardChatelainKirstenRalfFebruary14,2005AbstractThispaperstudieshowimperfectcollateralassignmentsofpatentscontributeto”deeppockets”savingsofinnovativermsfacingrandominvestmentoppor-tunitiesinResearchandDevelopment(R&D)anddeterminethegrowthoftheirinnovations,usingaversionoftheKiyotakiandMoore[1997]modelofcreditcy-cles.Resultsare:patentsascollateralleveragesR&Dnanceandmagniestheeectofinnovativerentsoninvestment;thecompositionofcurrentversusfuturenancialconstraintsimpliesthatrmssavingsdecreasethesteadystateaggre-gatedebt/patentratio;theinteractionbetweenhouseholdsandrmssavingsdeterminealeveragedgrowthofinnovationswhichdependsontheimperfectionofcollateral.Keywords:Collateral,Patents,ResearchandDevelopment,Creditra-tioning,Growth.UniversityofParisXandCEPREMAP,48BoulevardJourdan75014ParisFrance.E-mail:bruno.amable@cepremap.cnrs.frLEO,UniversityofOrleans.E-mail:jean-bernard.chatelain@univ-orleans.frAmericanUniversityofParis,147ruedeGrenelle,75007Paris,ESLSCAandCEPREMAP.E-mail:Ralfkirsten@aol.com.
“Itistheuncertaintycreatedbythislegalandregulatorystructure[intheUnitedStates]whichlendstotheverymarketimperfectionsandine-cienciescurrentlyminimizingtheabilitytoleveragethevalueofintellectualpropertyassetsandconsequentlystuntingtheeconomicgrowthofinventorsandentrepreneurs”Murphy[2002]reporttotheUnitedStatesPatentandTrademarkOce.Amoretraditionalinterpretationoftheinnovation-marketpowercor-relationisthatfailuresinnancialmarketsforcermstorelyontheirownsupra-normalprotstonancethesearchforinnovation.Theavailabilityofinternalsourcesoffunding(‘deeppockets’)areusefulforallformsofinvestment,butmaybeparticularlyimportantforR&D”,Blundell,GrithandVanReenen[1999].1.IntroductionThepracticeoflendersreceivingacollateralassignmentofapatentconditionalupontheoccurrenceofcontinuingdefaultisslowlybecomingmoreandmoreprevalentandimportantintheUnitedStates.1Wealthcreationisincreasinglybasedoninnovationthat,inturn,cangiverisetoimportantintellectualpropertyrights.Formanycom-panies,theseintellectualpropertyrightsmayrepresenttheirmostvaluableassets.Unfortunately,manyinnovatorslackthecapitalnecessarytodevelopnewresearchandmustturntooutsidesourcesforfunding.Aspartofthefunding,theprovidersofcapitalgenerallyrequirecollateralassignmentsofpatentsorsecurityinterestsinpatents.Duetothelimitedavailibilityofcollateral,innovatorsmayfaceanexter-nalnanceconstraintfosteredbytotheparticularimportanceofadverseselectionandmoralhazardproblemswhennancingR&D.Thatis,innovatorsdonotdiscloseprivateinformationonR&Dprojects.Whatismore,aspecicknowledgeoftheresearchareamayberequiredforecientexanteselectionofprojectsandexpostcontrol,whichinvolvesacostlyinvestmentforprovidersofexternalnance,suchasventurecapitalists(Keuschnigg[2004]).Thereisnowconsiderableempiricalevidencethatvariablesrelatedtonancingconstraintssuchasleverageand/orcashowavail-abilityarecorrelatedwithR&Dinvestmentinseveralcountries(seerecentsurveysbyBechettiandSierra[2001]andHall[2002]2).Blundell,GrithandVanReenen1PatentRatingsisaUSservicewhichprovidesratingsforpatentsascollateralinformationfornowseveralyears.InthecontextofU.S.statelawandfederallaw,collateralassignmentofpatentsrequirestofollowanumberofpracticaltipstolimitpotentiallegalrisksandlegalcosts(SchaveyRu[2003]).2e.g.studiesbyHimmelbergandPetersen[1994],Blundell,GrithandVanReenen[1999],Hall,Mairesse,BranstetterandCrepon[1999],Geroski,VanReenenandWalters[2001],Aghion,Bloom,Blundell,GrithandHowitt[2002].2
Voir icon more
Alternate Text