Do you think Zizek eg Badiou or take over from Sartre ?

pages

English

Documents

Écrit par
Frans Tassigny

Publié par
Une-Universite-de-la-Psychanalyse

Lire

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe Tout savoir sur nos offres

pages

English

Documents

Lire

Le téléchargement nécessite un accès à la bibliothèque YouScribe Tout savoir sur nos offres

Publié par

Une-Universite-de-la-Psychanalyse

Nombre de lectures

Langue

English

Or Zizek or Badiou are big enough to take over and Sartre
of all those who preceded him. It is not the quality of their
reflection is involved. Is that they do not offer system
thought suitable for deaf and expectations, however, a strong
Western world breathless. It goes Zizek, Badiou, and
even Derrida, Baudrillard as deconstruct the critical
thing is saving. But the critical deconstruction does not lead to
nothing if it does not stones needed for reconstruction.
This reconstruction is that everyone needs now.
[Moins]

Voir

Publié par

Une-Universite-de-la-Psychanalyse

Langue

English

What are the new paradigms?Do you think Zizek eg

BADIOU or take over from SARTRE?

Judith Butler seems ralier the fairer sex, the name of what?

To whom to turn?

Everywhere there is a malaise, West cherchedes masters, once those have sunk so qu'ilne door seems nothing left to them following, and then the Internet will

change that we bring oxygen to our renewal ...

Or Zizek or Badiou are big enough to take over and Sartre

of all those who preceded him. It is not the quality of their

reflection is involved. Is that they do not offer system

thought suitable for deaf and expectations, however, a strong

Western world breathless. It goes Zizek, Badiou, and

even Derrida, Baudrillard as deconstruct the critical

thing is saving. But the critical deconstruction does not lead to

nothing if it does not stones needed for reconstruction.

This reconstruction is that everyone needs now. A

Personally, I like the stuffed goose no longer hear

as tolerance, respect for differences, respect

environment, reinterpretations of reinterpreting the Lacanism

Freudianism, recent politico-financial scandals to date, the

kindness of celebrities pledging to defend causes

humanitarian any kind of denunciation of profits

astronomical made by the big banks, etc., etc..

I'm probably done poorly understand wanting to silence by

modesty, humility, doubt, my own ideas. But I think the

It is time to expose them. The alternative to democracy has

the name "épistémocratie" - I wrote a book with this title,

book that offers a completely new political system. To

alleged respect for differences, I oppose the notion of distances,

"networks of distances", "networks of bundles of distances."

I wrote a book developing these ideas book whose title is: "

Jazz, the imaginary and the political. "This is a book that follows

to "épistémocratie." I have also written a book which is a

critical consequences philosophical, cultural, social,

human existential seizure of power by the bourgeoisie, the

merchants, financiers. Again, the concepts are arranged in

proposals are made, bridges are built so that we

can pass a dying world to a new world. List

testing my political philosophy is not closed. At the risk of

a little too presumptuous, I do not see how thinking

current can offer many new concepts that I am

carrier. N.B. I say "carrier." I do not actually

responsible for everything. An unconscious, which does not depend on me,

push to run, get in shape, its preparatory work. To

back to concepts, they are fundamental. If Marx had such an echo,

if he could change the face of the world, the change probably

Again, this is because it has wrought (this is just example)

notion of "class struggle." Similarly for the critical

democracy. It is based, at home, on concepts very precisely

defined. It does not, I repeat, to oppose injustice,

to go against the current, it is open waterways

everyone can, upon reflection, borrow without fear

shipwreck. This is why Zizek, Badiou light of likely

some ways, but are not shepherds. This is also why

it is important to first publish in one way or another. My

various books are a backbone to any future

movement, whether political, economic, artistic, social and

psychoanalytic why not ....

Voir