A COMMENTARYON THEEPISTLE OF PAULGREEK TEXT OF THETOTHE EPHESIANS.BY THK LATEJOHN EADIE, D.D., LL.D.,PROFESSOR OK BIBLICAL LITERATURE AND EXEGESIS TO TliE UNITEDPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.Etiition.CfjirtEDITED BY REV. W. GLASGOW.YOUNG, M.A.,EDINBURGH:T. & 8 G E 11 G E fc> TRE E T.T. C LA 11 3K,1883.TTATAOS o TV alKaU <rr*^Wu(w ? x*2 *, rf ftpov<rp. BAiIA.ft,K{M uraiff.toti. 2KALTK. OliAT. II.T-JstjXtuv ruv Mor.u.u.rwj XKI Jyrtooy<ftii afQofyot yxuv. y.o /uvaauoiJruin-it.ff%i$ov IvratJ^ ^Xa?. TOT XPTiOiTOMOTi<f>6iy%*ro, TIIOBKi12;i/f T^V ivrio-ro/.r,*.-rjflf E(f>i<riovidiffieultatibus etQuantis qurun j)rofundis involutaqua-stionilmssit. Proocm. ill Comment, inHlERONYMUS, adE}>l#t. Ephtsios.Hoc ut membrorum ordincm eta^o, ostcndain, neinonoam, abjiciaturnativa et al) ]significatio verborum, aulo scntentiarnjubeo ipso]>eti ;it.iii aliud doctrinse.gigno genus ad Horn.MELANCHTHON, Ei>istoltePraEnarratio, fal.TO FIRST EDITION,PREFACEto a concisearc anTHE attempt givefollowing pagesto theof the of Paulbut full EpistleExpositionmindhas been to exhibit theobjectEphesians. ^Iyscientificnot aof theand meaning apostle, only bybut also a careful delineaof his byanalysis language,and of hisof the connectiontion sequencelogicalor detached annotaMere verbal criticismthoughts.and inthe various words themselvestion byuponas ita defective inasmuchsuccession is course, mayon ...
Voir